]>
IRCT20240610062080N1 IRCT 2024-08-03 The University of Faisalabad Comparative effects of muscle energy technique versus kinesiotaping on pain, mobility and kinesiophobia in information technology professionals with ergonomic related low back pain Comparative effects of muscle energy technique versus kinesiotaping on pain, mobility and kinesiophobia in information technology professionals with ergonomic related low back pain 2024-03-01 anticipated 30 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/77577 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Other design features: Randomized clinical Trial, Randomization description: Method of randomization is simple. Participants were randomly divided into two groups named as group A and group B by lottery method, Blinding description: when participants in the study do not know which group they have been allocated to, intervention or control. N/A Ergonomic related Low back pain. Intervention 1: 15 participants in group A were treated by kinesio taping plus conventional physical therapy. Conventional physical therapy includes dry heat and lumbar stabilization exercises as a baseline treatment. All the participants in group A were taped by physicians. It was lasted for 4 days before it was replaced. Taping was applied 3 times (baseline 4th , 8th days). Patients were instructed to keep the tape on between taping sessions. This procedure consisting a total period of 12 days. Intervention 2: Group B consisting of 15 participants were treated with muscle energy technique plus conventional physical therapy. Conventional physical therapy includes dry heat and lumbar stabilization exercises as a baseline treatment. Muscle energy technique was applied in the form of PIR on psoas group, hamstring, tensor fascia Lata, piriformis, quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles by holding 7-10s with 4 repetitions. The treatment of this group went for one month under 3 training / week. The readings for different outcome variables measured on 2nd and 4th week respectively. Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: Data will be provided by contacting on g mail. When: Data will be provided by contacting on g mail. To whom: Data will be provided by contacting on g mail. Conditions: Data will be provided by contacting on g mail. Where to obtain: Data will be provided by contacting on g mail. How to obtain: Data will be provided by contacting on g mail. Comments: no comments
public Sumbal Sohail
Rangeela Chowk House no.1147-DA GM Abad Faisalabad
Faisalabad Pakistan 38000 +92 334 6782341 sumbalsohai118@gmail.com.pk The University of Faisalabad scientific Mahvish Musharaf Randhawa
Rangeela Chowk House no.1147-DA GM Abad Faisalabad
Faisalabad Pakistan 38000 +92 300 8222334 zainy.fatima@yahoo.com The University of Faisalabad Pakistan Age 22 to 40 years Gender both male and female Pain score greater than 4 on VAS Experiencing WRLBP more than 90 days 22 years 40 years Both H/O of spinal surgeries Fracture Cancer Spondylolisthesis Serious cardio-respiratory disease Spinal stenosis Neuropathic pain M54.5 Low back pain Rehabilitation Rehabilitation 15 participants in group A were treated by kinesio taping plus conventional physical therapy. Conventional physical therapy includes dry heat and lumbar stabilization exercises as a baseline treatment. All the participants in group A were taped by physicians. It was lasted for 4 days before it was replaced. Taping was applied 3 times (baseline 4th , 8th days). Patients were instructed to keep the tape on between taping sessions. This procedure consisting a total period of 12 days. Group B consisting of 15 participants were treated with muscle energy technique plus conventional physical therapy. Conventional physical therapy includes dry heat and lumbar stabilization exercises as a baseline treatment. Muscle energy technique was applied in the form of PIR on psoas group, hamstring, tensor fascia Lata, piriformis, quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles by holding 7-10s with 4 repetitions. The treatment of this group went for one month under 3 training / week. The readings for different outcome variables measured on 2nd and 4th week respectively. The first outcome goal was Pain checked using the visual analog scale, an effective and accurate tool for measuring pain in patients with low back pain. The VAS is a 10-centimeter scale, with 0 showing no pain and 10 means severe pain. Timepoint: Total 3 readings were taken during the whole treatment. First was taken before treatment as a baseline reading. Then second reading was taken by post 2 week. Same as third reading was noted after 4th week. Method of measurement: By using Visual Analogue Scale. Mobility and kinesophobia. Timepoint: First reading was taken before treatment as a baseline reading. Then second reading was taken by post 2 week. Same as third reading was noted after 4th week. Total 3 readings were taken during the whole treatment. Method of measurement: Mobility by schober test , Kinesophobia by TAMPA scale. The University of Faisalabad Approved 2024-01-05 The University of Faisalabad Faisal Town, West Canal Road Faisalabad punjab Pakistan