]>
IRCT20230427058011N1 IRCT 2023-09-26 The University of Faisalabad COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE AND STRAIN COUNTERSTRAIN ON GAIT OF FAST BOWLERS WITH GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE AND STRAIN COUNTERSTRAIN ON GAIT OF FAST BOWLERS WITH GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS 2023-03-01 anticipated 42 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/70666 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Other, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: Randomized clinical trial, a single-blinded experimental study was conducted. There was the formation of two study groups out of selected sample naming as group A and group B. Simple random sampling technique was used for the recruitment of study participants and they were allocating to groups using lottery method by keeping the allocation ratio (1:1) for both groups, Blinding description: Participants were blinded from the interventionl groups during the study. They didn't know which study group contain which intervention. N/A Condition 1: GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS. Condition 2: GAIT IN GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS. Intervention 1: Intervention group A Muscle Energy Technique (MET): Group A subject received 10 minutes session of moist hot pack from hydro collator at 55 degrees followed by a set of 7 repetitions of calf stretching where each stretch was held static for 10 seconds & after which treatment for each group was performed. This baseline treatment took almost 15 minutes. After that the participants of group A post-isometric relaxation technique of muscle energy technique was used. On a therapeutic bed, the participants were lying face down with their feet dangling off the edge. The individual feels a tension barrier when the dominant foot is gently moved into dorsiflexion. The subject next be told to perform an isometric contraction for seven seconds using 20% of their maximal strength against the therapist's resistance. The subject was told to relax after seven seconds as the therapist moves their ankle into a deeper range of dorsiflexion till, they feel the next stress barrier. This tension barrier continued for 60 seconds. There were three instances of this process. Total session time of group A treatment along with the common/baseline treatment was 30 minutes. Intervention 2: Intervention group B Strain Counter Strain (SCS): Group B subject received 10 minutes session of moist hot pack from hydro collator at 55 degrees followed by a set of 7 repetitions of calf stretching where each stretch was held static for 10 seconds & after which treatment for each group was performed. This baseline treatment took almost 15 minutes. After that the subject was laying prone with the knee bent at a 90-degree angle and ankle plantarflexed. Therapist exerted intense manual pressure on the trigger point, had been palpated and hold it 90 seconds. This process was carried out three times. Total session time of group B treatment along with the common/baseline treatment was 30 minutes. Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE AND STRAIN COUNTERSTRAIN ON GAIT OF FAST BOWLERS WITH GASTROCNEMIUS TRIGGER POINTS When: The Data will be available till the end of 2023 To whom: Data will be available to all the students whom has access to the desired journals in which it will be published Conditions: Cannot be used for republished purpose. For Study and knowledge purpose only Where to obtain: mail at nabeelzahid7@gmail.com How to obtain: Detail how you want to use this data and for what purpose Comments:
public Mohsin Ali
Fsd
Faisalabad Pakistan 38000 +92 307 7140056 dr.m.mohsinali.pt@gmail.com The University of Faisalabad scientific Nabeel Zahid
P60 Ayesha Block Abdullah Garden Canal Road Faisalabad
Faisalabad Pakistan 38000 +92 322 6373400 nabeelzahid7@gmail.com The University of Faisalabad Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan Fast bowlers willing to participate in the age group of 20-30 years Fast bowlers having at least one hypersensitive tender nodule within a palpable taut band in the gastrocnemius muscle Fast bowlers having ankle dorsiflexion range of motion less than 20 degrees Pain intensity of more than 4 on numeric pain rating scale Subjects running for 3 days per week for more than 6-months will be recruited 20 years 30 years Male Participants having Fibromyalgia syndrome Congenital deformity of the foot and ankle Tumors of the lower back and lower limb Lower limb fractures Diabetic neuropathy Peripheral vascular disease 3-month recent injuries to legs, foot or ankle will be excluded from the study M70.90 R26.2 Unspecified soft tissue disorder related to use, overuse and pressure of unspecified site Difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified Treatment - Other Treatment - Other Intervention group A Muscle Energy Technique (MET): Group A subject received 10 minutes session of moist hot pack from hydro collator at 55 degrees followed by a set of 7 repetitions of calf stretching where each stretch was held static for 10 seconds & after which treatment for each group was performed. This baseline treatment took almost 15 minutes. After that the participants of group A post-isometric relaxation technique of muscle energy technique was used. On a therapeutic bed, the participants were lying face down with their feet dangling off the edge. The individual feels a tension barrier when the dominant foot is gently moved into dorsiflexion. The subject next be told to perform an isometric contraction for seven seconds using 20% of their maximal strength against the therapist's resistance. The subject was told to relax after seven seconds as the therapist moves their ankle into a deeper range of dorsiflexion till, they feel the next stress barrier. This tension barrier continued for 60 seconds. There were three instances of this process. Total session time of group A treatment along with the common/baseline treatment was 30 minutes. Intervention group B Strain Counter Strain (SCS): Group B subject received 10 minutes session of moist hot pack from hydro collator at 55 degrees followed by a set of 7 repetitions of calf stretching where each stretch was held static for 10 seconds & after which treatment for each group was performed. This baseline treatment took almost 15 minutes. After that the subject was laying prone with the knee bent at a 90-degree angle and ankle plantarflexed. Therapist exerted intense manual pressure on the trigger point, had been palpated and hold it 90 seconds. This process was carried out three times. Total session time of group B treatment along with the common/baseline treatment was 30 minutes. Pain. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Pain was measured using NPRS (numerical pain rating scale). Cadence. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by using stop watch and measuring tape. Stride length. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Measured by using stop watch and measuring tape. Ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: Using goniometer. Sprinting and Function. Timepoint: Before intervention, after 2nd week of intervention and after 4th week of intervention. Method of measurement: LEFS (lower extremity functional scale). The University of Faisalabad Approved 2023-03-24 RESEARCH AND ETHICS / TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Faisal Town, West Canal Road Faisalabad Punjab Pakistan