]>
IRCT20220524054979N1 IRCT 2022-07-16 Urmia Dental Clinic Painkiller effect of 4% Lidocaine versus 4% Articaine after wisdom teeth extraction Comparison of Articaine 4% and Lidocaine 2% for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery 2022-06-22 anticipated 36 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/63861 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: In order to randomize, patients are divided into two groups using the blocks made by statistical software: In the first group, the surgery is conducted using Lidocaine 2%, and in the second group, the surgery is performed using Articaine 4%. All surgeries will be performed by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon and in one room with an assistant. The type of anesthesia will be selected randomly in the first surgery and will not be told to the surgeon prior to the start of injection and finishing the surgical procedure, Blinding description: Researchers examining the parameters of anesthesia success will not be aware of the type of intervention performed on the patient. Also, patients themselves will not be aware of the intervention. N/A Oral Surgery. Intervention 1: Local Anesthesia administration in the mandible with Articaine 4% (SeptocaineFrance, Septodont) (with 1:100000 Epinephrine,3.6 ml, using 27 gauge needle with the speed of 1 mL/min. The needle bevel was at the bone side. Group 1 : Inferior Alveolar nerve Block Anesthesia For Third Molar. Intervention 2: Local Anesthesia administration in the mandible with Lidocaine 2% (xylopen; Exir pharmaceutical Co, Iran) (with 1:100000 Epinephrine,3.6 ml, using 27 gauge needle with the speed of 1 mL/min. The needle bevel was at the bone side. Group 1 : Inferior Alveolar nerve Block Anesthesia For Third Molar. Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: No When: After Publication To whom: Patients Conditions: Informed Consent Where to obtain: Clinicians How to obtain: Online Access Comments:
public Ehsan Hooshyar
Alborz
Urmia Iran (Islamic Republic of) :5714783734 +98 44 3336 3600 Hooshyar.e@umsu.ac.ir Urmia University of Medical science scientific Farhad Nojan
Alborz
Urmia Iran (Islamic Republic of) 5714783734 +98 44 3336 3600 farhad_nojan@yahoo.com Urmia University of Medical Science Iran (Islamic Republic of) Mandibular Third Molar Surgery Indication 18 years 40 years Both Systemic Disease Analgesics Consumption during last 24 hours Allergic Reaction to Local Anesthesia Agents Hyperalgesic Syndrome Pregnancy and Lactating G89.1 Acute pain, not elsewhere classified Treatment - Drugs Treatment - Drugs Local Anesthesia administration in the mandible with Articaine 4% (SeptocaineFrance, Septodont) (with 1:100000 Epinephrine,3.6 ml, using 27 gauge needle with the speed of 1 mL/min. The needle bevel was at the bone side. Group 1 : Inferior Alveolar nerve Block Anesthesia For Third Molar Local Anesthesia administration in the mandible with Lidocaine 2% (xylopen; Exir pharmaceutical Co, Iran) (with 1:100000 Epinephrine,3.6 ml, using 27 gauge needle with the speed of 1 mL/min. The needle bevel was at the bone side. Group 1 : Inferior Alveolar nerve Block Anesthesia For Third Molar Postoperative Pain. Timepoint: 7, 4 and 21 days. Method of measurement: Visual Analog Scale. Anesthesia Duration. Timepoint: 0-12. Method of measurement: Cronometer. Anesthesia Start. Timepoint: 0-12. Method of measurement: Watch. Surgery Duration. Timepoint: 0-10. Method of measurement: Cronometer. Urmia Dental Clinic Approved 2021-11-16 Urmia University of Medical science ethics in Biomedicine researches committee Alborz Urmia West Azarbaijan Iran (Islamic Republic of)