]>
IRCT20210814052182N1 IRCT 2021-08-23 Yasmin physiotherapy center Effects of mobilization technique with manual therapy in spondylosis related back pain. Effects of spinal mobilization with muscle energy techniques versus strain counter-strain in chronic low back pain due to spondylosis. 2021-05-25 anticipated 36 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/58111 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Health service research, Randomization description: Randomization of participants was accomplished by using simple random sampling by means of lottery method, Blinding description: The participants will not be aware of the study groups and this will be carried out by keeping them anonymous for the study period. 3 Spondylosis related chronic low back pain. Intervention 1: Intervention group: Group A (spinal mobilization with muscle energy technique). Intervention 2: Intervention group: Group B (spinal mobilization with strain counter-strain). No - There is not a plan to make this available Justification or reason for not sharing IPD is As we have signed and assured the participants that their data will not be shared anywhere else other than the current study
public Saira Tariq
University town, Sargodha road, Faisalabad
Faisalabad Pakistan 38000 +92 41 2402081 sairatariq19@hotmail.com The University of Faisalabad scientific Saira Tariq
University town, Sargodha road, Faisalabad
Faisalabad Pakistan 38000 +92 41 2402081 sairatariq19@hotmail.com The University of Faisalabad Pakistan Individuals having chronic low back pain with or without radiation from at least last 3 months or onwards were recruited in this study Participants of age group 40 to 60 years were selected Both genders male and female were included Physical examination to be done: Limited range of motion of lumbar spinal region like extension (<4cm), flexion (<7cm) or side flexion (<25cm) on modified Schober’s test.  Extension should be more limited than other movements.  Pain during extension like standing and relieved by flexion like sitting. There should be no neurological deficits Diagnosis confirmed by X-Ray showing signs of degeneration Individuals having 4-7 (moderate) pain score on Visual Analogue Scale were recruited Individuals having moderate disability (21%-40%) on Oswestry Disability Index were selected 44 years 55 years Both Participants having prolapse with neurologic signs and symptoms necessitating surgery were excluded Pregnancy females were not included in study Spondylolisthesis patients were excluded Individuals having mechanical strain were excluded Fractures of lumbar region were not taken Osteoporosis patients were excluded Previous back surgery patients were not taken in study Known rheumatic, neurologic, or mental diseases were not recruited Other red flags (contra-indications) to manual therapy were also excluded Low back pain due to any other comorbidities Chronic low back pain Treatment - Other Treatment - Other Intervention group: Group A (spinal mobilization with muscle energy technique) Intervention group: Group B (spinal mobilization with strain counter-strain) Pain in low back. Timepoint: Before intervention, at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale. Lumber range of motion. Timepoint: Before intervention, at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Schober's test. Disability. Timepoint: Before intervention and after intervention. Method of measurement: Oswestry Disability Index. Yasmin physiotherapy center Approved 2021-05-25 Ethics and Technical committee of The University of Faisalabad University town, Sargodha road, Faisalabad Faisalabad Punjab Pakistan