]>
IRCT20200802048274N1 IRCT 2020-09-05 Islamic Azad University Comparison of the efficacy of treatment based on acceptance and commitment and positive psychotherapy on the acceptance of Pain, self-compassion and affects control of cancer patients Comparison of the efficacy of treatment based on acceptance and commitment and positive psychotherapy on the acceptance of Pain, self-compassion and affects control of cancer patients 2019-02-19 anticipated 39 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/50100 interventional Randomization: Not randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Education/Guidance. N/A Cancer. Intervention 1: The following treatment protocol was performed in eight sessions. Session 1: 1- Presenting generalities of the group protocol, introducing the members and expectations of the group 2- Short mindfulness meditation 3- Written practice of self-affirmation and expression of values ​​4- Description of the exercise (homework) Three good events 5- Mindfulness meditation. Session 2: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about practicing three good events 3- Discussion about self-worthwhile results 4- Description of exercise (homework) Strengths 5- Mindfulness meditation. Session 3: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about practicing the use of strengths 3- Description of exercise (homework) Enjoyment 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 4: 1- Mindfulness meditation 3- Discussion about exercise (homework) Enjoyment 4- Description of exercise (homework) Having a good day 5- Mindfulness meditation. Session 5: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about exercise (homework) Having a good day 3- Introduction of exercise (homework) Appreciation meeting 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 6: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about exercise (homework) Appreciation meeting 3- Introduction of exercise (homework) Active / constructive answer 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 7: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about practice (homework) Active / constructive answer 3- Introduction of biography writing practice 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 8: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about (homework) Writing a biography 3- Introducing positive service assignment 4- Mindfulness meditation 5- Discussion about the final session. Intervention 2: Control group: will not receive any intervention. Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: Cannot share at this time. When: Cannot share at this time. To whom: Cannot share at this time. Conditions: Cannot share at this time. Where to obtain: Cannot share at this time. How to obtain: Cannot share at this time. Comments: Cannot share at this time.
public Kouroush Fathi
Dehdasht 7th of Tir street
Dehdasht Iran (Islamic Republic of) 7571759381 +98 74 3226 3011 F_korosh@yahoo.com Islamic Azad University scientific Kouroush Fathi
7th of Tir Street
Dehdasht Iran (Islamic Republic of) 7571759381 +98 74 3226 3011 f_korosh@yahoo.com Islamic Azad University Iran (Islamic Republic of) Have a history of at least one year of cancer Have a minimum education level of diploma Age range 50-20 years 20 years 50 years Male Do not have acute mental problem Behavior Behavior The following treatment protocol was performed in eight sessions. Session 1: 1- Presenting generalities of the group protocol, introducing the members and expectations of the group 2- Short mindfulness meditation 3- Written practice of self-affirmation and expression of values ​​4- Description of the exercise (homework) Three good events 5- Mindfulness meditation. Session 2: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about practicing three good events 3- Discussion about self-worthwhile results 4- Description of exercise (homework) Strengths 5- Mindfulness meditation. Session 3: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about practicing the use of strengths 3- Description of exercise (homework) Enjoyment 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 4: 1- Mindfulness meditation 3- Discussion about exercise (homework) Enjoyment 4- Description of exercise (homework) Having a good day 5- Mindfulness meditation. Session 5: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about exercise (homework) Having a good day 3- Introduction of exercise (homework) Appreciation meeting 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 6: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about exercise (homework) Appreciation meeting 3- Introduction of exercise (homework) Active / constructive answer 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 7: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about practice (homework) Active / constructive answer 3- Introduction of biography writing practice 4- Mindfulness meditation. Session 8: 1- Mindfulness meditation 2- Discussion about (homework) Writing a biography 3- Introducing positive service assignment 4- Mindfulness meditation 5- Discussion about the final session. Control group: will not receive any intervention. One of the important concepts in contemporary theories is how a person reacts and adapts to chronic pain. Accepting pain is the first step in adapting to changes in life in a way that allows the person to continue to work in the living environment and at the same time try to control pain. Timepoint: At the beginning and before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and 2 months after the last intervention session. Method of measurement: The McCracken Pain Acceptance Scale and the Williams and Chambles Emotion Control Scale will be used to collect data. The McCracken & Wools Pain Acceptance Scale has two components: the tendency to accept pain and active participation and has a total of 20 items, 9 of which are related to the component of tendency to accept pain (items 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 20) and its 11 items are related to the active participation component (items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15 and 19). Scoring is done on a Likert scale of 7 degrees. This scale has well shown a good internal consistency with an alpha of 0.82 for the pain acceptance component and 0.78 for the active participation component. The results of factor analysis in the study of McCracken, McLeod and Ecclestone, (2008), confirmed the existence of two factors: the tendency to accept pain and active participation and the validity of this scale has also been confirmed. In Iran, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of this scale has been reported in research 0.87. Emotion Control Scale: This scale has 42 questions made by Williams and Chambels and its purpose is to evaluate the ability to control emotions from the basics of the 15th Amendment. Emotions have a valid internal consistency, the correlation of the test between the subscales of the test, and between the questions of the scale is significant at the level of 0.01 confidence. The validity of the emotion control test among students, teachers, nurses, and professors in Iran is relatively high and has an acceptable level and the test questions are correlated with each other, so the questions of this test are suitable for measuring emotion control. She has defined compassion as a three-component construct that includes kindness to oneself versus self-judgment, human commonalities versus isolation, and awareness versus extreme assimilation. Timepoint: Measurement periods at the beginning and before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and 2 months after the last intervention session. Method of measurement: The McCracken Pain Acceptance Scale and the Williams and Chambles Emotion Control Scale will be used to collect data. The McCracken & Wools Pain Acceptance Scale has two components: tendency to accept pain and active participation, and has a total of 20 items, 9 of which are related to the component of tendency to accept pain (items 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17 , 18 and 20) and its 11 items are related to the active participation component (items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15 and 19). Scoring is done on a Likert scale of 7 degrees. This scale has well shown a good internal consistency with alpha of 0.82 for the pain acceptance component and 0.78 for the active participation component. The results of factor analysis in the study of McCracken, McLeod and Ecclestone, (2008), confirmed the existence of two factors: the tendency to accept pain and active participation, and the validity of this scale has also been confirmed. In Iran, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of this scale has been reported in research 0.87. Emotion Control Scale: This scale has 42 questions made by Williams and Chambers and its purpose is to evaluate the ability to control emotions from the basics of the 15th Amendment. Emotions have a valid internal consistency, the correlation of the test between the subscales of the test, and between the questions of the scale is significant at the level of 0.01 confidence. The validity of the emotion control test among students, teachers, nurses and professors in Iran is relatively high and has an acceptable level and the test questions are correlated with each other, so the questions of this test are suitable for measuring emotion control. Emotion control includes controlling anger, depression, anxiety, and positive emotions. Timepoint: Measurement periods at the beginning and before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and 2 months after the last intervention session. Method of measurement: The McCracken Pain Acceptance Scale and the Williams and Chambles Emotion Control Scale will be used to collect data. The McCracken & Wools Pain Acceptance Scale has two components: tendency to accept pain and active participation, and has a total of 20 items, 9 of which are related to the component of tendency to accept pain (items 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17 , 18 and 20) and its 11 items are related to the active participation component (items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15 and 19). Scoring is done on a Likert scale of 7 degrees. This scale has well shown a good internal consistency with alpha of 0.82 for the pain acceptance component and 0.78 for the active participation component. The results of factor analysis in the study of McCracken, McLeod and Ecclestone, (2008), confirmed the existence of two factors: the tendency to accept pain and active participation, and the validity of this scale has also been confirmed. In Iran, Cronbach's alpha coefficient of this scale has been reported in research 0.87. Emotion Control Scale: This scale has 42 questions made by Williams and Chambers and its purpose is to evaluate the ability to control emotions from the basics of the 15th Amendment. Emotions have a valid internal consistency, the correlation of the test between the subscales of the test, and between the questions of the scale is significant at the level of 0.01 confidence. The validity of the emotion control test among students, teachers, nurses and professors in Iran is relatively high and has an acceptable level and the test questions are correlated with each other, so the questions of this test are suitable for measuring emotion control. A term for theories and research about what makes life most valuable. Timepoint: At the beginning and before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and 2 months after the last intervention session. Method of measurement: questionnaire. One of the therapies is the third wave, which emphasizes mindfulness, and is based on the acceptance of suffering (embedded in) life and committed action based on values to enjoy a richer life. Timepoint: At the beginning and before the intervention, immediately after the intervention and 2 months after the last intervention session. Method of measurement: questionnaire. does not have Approved 2020-03-08 Yasuj University of Medical Sciences 7 tir Yasuj Kohgilouyeh-va-Boyrahmad Iran (Islamic Republic of)