]>
IRCT20200107046041N1 IRCT 2020-03-30 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Fractional Erb-YAG laser versus combined fractional Erb-YAG laser and local platelet-rich plasma in facial rejuvenation Fractional Erb-YAG laser versus combined fractional Erb-YAG laser and local platelet-rich plasma in facial rejuvenation, in patients reffered to Shohadaye Tajrish hospital, 2019-2020 2020-02-20 anticipated 40 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/44868 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Health service research, Randomization description: Randomization using Random Number Table, Blinding description: The ambiguity in this study would be that both the researcher (and the laser operator) and the patients were unaware of the treatment or treatment group received. The method of double blinding would be to ask a third party other than the researcher and operator to cover the saline and PRP tubes with colored labels (each a special color) so that neither the researcher nor The operator of the device used the material and diagnose it based on color. N/A Skin Rejuvenation. Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: One half of face PRP 10cc 3session 1month interval with fractional erb yag laser total fluence 60 j on cm2 pulse duration400 microsecond 3session 1month interval. Intervention 2: intervention group 2:Another half of face fractional erb yag laser total fluence 60 j on cm2 pulse duration400 microsecond 3session 1month interval. Undecided - It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make this available Justification or reason for indecision in sharing IPD is No more information.
public Dr Arash Rahbar
shahrdari
Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1989934148 +98 21 25719 Arashrahbar10@gmail.com Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences scientific Dr Arash Rahbar
Shahrdari
Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1989934148 +98 21 25719 Arashrahbar10@gmail.com Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Iran (Islamic Republic of) Women 60-35 years Mild to moderate wrinkles at rest 35 years 60 years Female Male gender Under 35 and over 60 years of age Breastfeeding and pregnancy Perform other facial cosmetic procedures like Botox, Derm abrasion, Chemical Peeling and Face Lift in the past 6 months Oral isotretinoin in the past 6 months6- History of colloid formation Not willing to participate in the study Treatment - Devices Treatment - Devices Intervention group 1: One half of face PRP 10cc 3session 1month interval with fractional erb yag laser total fluence 60 j on cm2 pulse duration400 microsecond 3session 1month interval intervention group 2:Another half of face fractional erb yag laser total fluence 60 j on cm2 pulse duration400 microsecond 3session 1month interval Wrinkle removal. Timepoint: Patients are monitored for reviscometer and digital imaging in the first session (baseline), second and third treatment, and 3 months after the last laser session. Method of measurement: The results are evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively: In the qualitative method, the patients are photographed with the same digital camera before the start of the project and then at each visit. The improvement is in the percentage of zero to one hundred. Finally, the rate of recovery is defined as No response (less than 10%), mild response (10-25%), moderate response (25-50%) and good response (50-75%) Excellent response (over 75%) Is. Quantitative testing is done by the multi probe adapter system MPA5. MPA5 is a device for checking the suitability of various biophysical parameters of the skin. Using Reviscometer based on Resonance running time acoustic waves and mechanical properties of skin are measured skin resonance time and thus determine the biological age of the skin at different angles. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Approved 2020-01-21 Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Velenjak Tehran Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of)