IRCT20120215009014N315 IRCT 2019-10-30 Sanandaj University of Medical Sciences Comparison of the perp of the surgical location with betadine 10% versus chlorhexidine gluconate 4% on the incidence rate and the severity of wound infection after upper limb orthopedic elective surgery Comparison of the perp of the surgical location with betadine 10% versus chlorhexidine gluconate 4% on the incidence rate and the severity of wound infection after upper limb orthopedic elective surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial 2019-11-22 anticipated 140 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/43299 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Prevention, Randomization description: Random assignment of the patients to the intervention and control groups through the drawing of lots. To do this, we prepare two sheets and write "intervention" on one sheet and "control" on another. Then, by referring each patient, one of the sheets will be randomly taken and the patient will be assigned to the intervention or control group, Blinding description: Patients will be unaware of the type of intervention. The physician who will examine the patients will not be aware of the intervention. Thus, the trial will be run as double-blind. N/A Surgical wound infection. Intervention 1: Intervention group:Perp of the surgical location with chlorhexidine gluconate 4% for 3 minutes. Intervention 2: Control group:Perp of the surgical location with betadine 10% for 3 minutes. Undecided - It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make this available Justification or reason for indecision in sharing IPD is It depends on the situations and the results of the study as well as the approval of the financial supporting organization.