IRCT20150107020592N8 IRCT 2018-01-13 Masih Daneshvari Hospital The Comparison between two method of minisurgical percutaneous dilated tracheostomy A double blind randomized controlled clinical trial study of comparison between two method of minisurgical percutaneous dilated tracheostomy, the standard method (Use of Tracheal Tube) or I gel insertion 2017-10-12 anticipated 66 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/18247 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Supportive, Randomization description: The groups randomization will performed based on the A and B allocation group. this process will managed by computerizing allocation, Blinding description: With regard to blindness, the study of the patient and the person who carries out the PDT is blind to the study, and the third person who is nurse in the department who is unaware of the study, are filling the questionnaire. N/A The relationship between two methods of small throat surgery through the skin. Intervention 1: In the Conventional Method that will perform with ETT it will retract till to vocal cords to open enough space for the catheter insertion. Intervention 2: In Igel Method after the airway assessment and patient suctioning (to avoid aspiration),the Igel will lubricated by gelly lubricant and it will iuserted orally. No - There is not a plan to make this available Justification or reason for not sharing IPD is to consider ethical problem